English Newspaper Telegraph write:

The WHO may be authorized to impose a lockdown on the UK

Lawmakers fear a new agreement designed to boost the organization’s powers will allow it to enforce border closures and create vaccine passports.

Lockdown measures could be imposed on Britain by the World Health Organization (WHO) during a future pandemic under new far-reaching powers, ministers fear.

Member states will be obliged to follow the agency’s instructions when responding to the pandemic, including by introducing vaccination passports, border closures and quarantine measures, according to the draft update of the regulations.

A new “pandemic agreement” under discussion would also force the UK to spend five per cent of its health budget preparing for another virus outbreak.

We understand that ministers are concerned about plans to increase WHO’s powers, which would allow its regulatory body to demand that countries hand over vaccine prescriptions, regardless of intellectual property rights, and act on misinformation.

Conservative lawmakers have written to ministers warning of the “real ambition… for WHO to move from an advisory body to a controlling international authority”.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs called for blocking powers

In their letter, which has been seen by The Telegraph, they urge the Foreign Office to block powers that “appear to substantially interfere with Britain’s ability to make its own rules and control its own budget”.

Responding to concerns on Thursday, Andrew Mitchell, a senior State Department official, told The Telegraph he would block any legislation preventing Britain from setting its own health policy.

“The UK supports the Pandemic Agreement now being negotiated by national authorities, which could speed up the sharing of data on new pandemic threats so we can respond quickly in the event of a future pandemic,” he said.

“We are clear that we will never agree to anything that conflicts with our principles of sovereignty or prevents the UK from taking decisive action against future pandemics.”

Changes to make WHO advice ‘binding’

The rule changes have been proposed as part of plans to update WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR) in light of the coronavirus pandemic and establish a new Pandemic Preparedness Agreement.

Here at home, the politicians are, as usual, “spreaders”, as they say in Bergen:

Minister of Health Kjerkol: – We must consolidate WHO as an institution that does not tolerate violations

At a WHO meeting in Geneva on 23 May 2022, Health Minister Ingvild Kjerkol handed Norway independence on a silver plate. He not only agreed that the future WHO should be given the power to override national governments and parliaments and issue global directives. He did it with great enthusiasm as he said (translated from the original English on the government website):

“I am encouraged that we have agreed to negotiate a pandemic agreement, strengthen International Health Regulations, and bring WHO funding towards sustainability. I am also encouraged by WHO’s capacity to address humanitarian health crises. Norway will continue our support for important aspects of this WHO mandate .

We now have the opportunity to ensure that health is protected by more efficient systems, stronger accountability and trust, and by fairness, solidarity and human rights. We hope that the Director General will also take advantage of this moment and ensure WHO accountability that upholds ethical standards. We must consolidate WHO as our leader that is effective, accountable and capable of multilateralism, and an institution that does not tolerate abuse.”

“Zero tolerance for violations”

The government will therefore hand over power to the unelected WHO so they can appear “zero tolerance for violations”. What’s this? Do Ap and the Center Party have a template for what constitutes “bad behavior” and what it means to have “zero tolerance” for this? When was this served to Norwegians? When was it discussed in the Storting? Is that stated somewhere in Norwegian law?

It is clear that Labor longs for the global health dictatorship they can hide from when they become its local practitioners.

But conservative politicians in Britain were already starting to wake up, even if it was at the twelfth hour. The agreement is being adopted today.

Read more on steigan.no about WHO agreement proposals.

Campaign