The British High Court ruled that the agreement signed at the time between the Rwandan authorities and Boris Johnson was valid and supported deportation

That British High Court issued a ruling in favor of the immigration policies of the Conservative government of Rishi Sunak.

After five days of deliberations, it was stated that an agreement was signed at that time between the Rwandan authorities and Boris Johnsondefended Sunak, is legal.

It thus concluded that the UK Home Office could send asylum seekers to an African country so that their applications could be processed – and, if necessary, granted.

It must be remembered that last June, the first plane that was due to leave for Rwanda to implement the agreement did not take off: it was stopped on the ground by European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

Major humanitarian organizations, the Anglican Church and even the Prince of Wales at the time, Charles of England, described the act as inhumane and unjust.

Downing Street is still trying to stop an increase in irregular immigration and now Justice has given it the go-ahead to implement the decision.

“The government is following the law by implementing a mechanism to relocate asylum seekers to Rwanda, and their claims are decided in Rwanda, not in the UK,” he concluded.

After noting that the project generated “considerable public debate”, the court clarified that its role was “to ensure that laws are understood and complied with in an appropriate manner” that the rights guaranteed by Parliament are respected.

However, he agreed with eight asylum seekers who appealed in a private capacity against the UK Home Office’s efforts to deport them.