Although currently knowledge about chatbots is being developed by Open AI limited until September 2021, GPT Chat along with tech giants Google, you are ready to access the latest news. A possibility that represents an important advance in the capabilities of this technology, although it also raises major concerns regarding the major challenges faced by this technology. artificial intelligence with real-time information.

Ambition to provide users of this system Generative AI access to “up-to-date and authoritative” data is something that could bring major changes to the way we obtain and consume news; and this situation has not gone unnoticed UK Independent Publishers Alliancewho expressed his deep concern and suggested that this bot crawl be stopped immediately.

One of the main fears is this expansion GPT Chat and its ability to offer real-time information can increase the number of calls “zero-click search”. This means that readers can get details and information without having to visit them in person website from the original news.

While this may increase efficiency in obtaining information, it raises concerns about this media sustainability communication and content monetization.

Search engines, such as Google And Bing, has offered publishers the option to block or allow AI bots to access their websites. This decision is not a trivial matter, because it has important implications for the editor and his relationship with the editor technology. Some publishers have chosen to block access GPTBotwhile others decide not to limit it.

The reasons behind the decision were varied, as several editors expressed concern about the additional costs that might arise as a result of the increase bot traffic. A phenomenon that can particularly affect smaller publishers who may have limited resources to manage this increased traffic.

Apart from costs, content protection is also a major concern when authors are concerned about it A.I may copy your content indiscriminately and negatively impact the integrity of your work and income.

Lastly, some publishers feel that blocking access in the first place gives them a negotiating position stronger in future content licensing discussions. This strategy will allow them to set clear rules before opening the door to artificial intelligence.

The situation is further complicated by the diversity of opinions and approaches among the editors. Meanwhile, leading names such as New York Times, Reuters And Athletics have chosen to block GPTBotothers like it Daily Mirror and it BBC They have decided not to limit access. This diversity of responses reflects the complexity of the dilemmas publishers face in the AI ​​era.

An interesting opinion is from Luke Budka, an AI strategist, who highlights the complexities publishers face in making decisions; warns that they must be precise when creating these blocks so as not to affect common search robots such as Googlebotwhile limiting access to certain AI training robots such as Google-Extended.

Ultimately, there is no universal answer for all publishers and each publisher must carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of blocking or allowing access to AI bots such as GPT Chat. Data compensation and the risk of not being included in AI-generated content are important considerations in this equation.

To find a comprehensive solution, stakeholders are looking forward to possible discussions at the upcoming AI ethics conference in the UK.