The government does not plan to compensate operators for the possible exclusion of Huawei from the national 5G network. This information was conveyed at this fourth exhibition to the Minister of Infrastructure, João Galamba, who oversees this sector.

“This moment is not important,” journalists answered, outside an event at Altice Portugal, when asked if this was a hypothesis. “But we have maintained dialogue with operators and that dialogue continues,” he added, signaling that the talks were making progress.

Because, there was deliberation Avaliação Security Commissionwhich falls within the scope of the Conselho Superior de Segurança do Ciberespaço, created at the end of May, which, among other things, is classified as “high risk” The use of equipment from companies from regions other than Europe, the United States or other OECD countries in 5G networks foresees the application of restrictions or exclusion of equipment from these companies from national networks. The discussion does not mention the name of the company or country, but what is certain is that the Huawei case is the first that comes to mind, one of which is because the Chinese technology company launched a 5G network in other countries, including the UK and. Sweden. . In this case, sources who heard from Business were not shy about emphasizing that this was a “tailor-made” consideration by Huawei. Furthermore, the Chinese company itself is responsible, as this case is directed at itself, to promote administrative action in a fair manner at the deliberations.

Although there are still many details to know, with some information in the “free reserved”, one of the tasks that is rapidly increasing is paying the costs of possible removal of equipment from companies like Huawei, once our telecom operators start to develop networks. Galamba’s words, now well known, make it clear that this task must be carried out by the operator, when the State is unable to guarantee payment.

Business actors questioned the Minister of Infrastructure’s statement to telecommunications operators, but until this article was published, they had not received a response. Fonte ouvida hair Negócios, at the peak of the deliberations made, explained that the possible exclusion of equipment could be charged at two levels: “It is better to buy equipment that is more expensive and can replace the existing one, because as a large part of 5G is Assente in the 4G network it is necessary Network equipment is replaced.

The implementation of the deliberations is up to Anacom, which has asked the telecommunications company to implement plans to implement the Security Availability Commission’s decision.