It was a stream of revelation that almost always came from intelligence service, and which range from the movement of Russian troops to military deployments along the border with Ukraine, possible plans to replace the current European Ukrainian government with a pro-Russian one, and even possible false flag attacks by Russian elements to justify an attack or invasion. Since the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, Biden Administration It has used, in a very aggressive manner and in close coordination with the UK, the information it handles, making it available to public opinion very quickly and informing in advance of possible Kremlin plans in the neighboring country. Although the effects of this information policy have not been studied, many experts believe that, at the very least, it prevented Russian authorities from using their usual disinformation techniques, apart from putting Moscow on the defensive and sowing confusion in its ranks.
“We have learned a lot, especially since 2014, about how Russia uses the information space as part of its security and military apparatus,” he said. Emily J. Horne, spokeswoman for the National Security Council. “And we’ve learned how to prevent some of (this information) from impacting this space.” This is a winning strategy, at least in the short term, he said Country Angela Stent, intelligence agent for Asia and Eurasia between 2004 and 2006. “If there is an attack, the US can say they warned it; if not, you could say he prevented it by revealing his plan, he continued.
Revealing a plan that the Kremlin can consider in a neighboring country also has an added effect demoralize and confuse rivals, say experts: they imply that they are at the fore and that they have a high penetration rate in a country like Russia, where the secret service is one of the most important pillars of the State. It was a way for the Biden Administration to show Russia that Washington “knows what they are doing”, while “compromising their operations”, James C Johnson, former US Secretary of Homeland Security, has stated to The New York Times.
Something that, moreover, seems to manifest in close coordination with the UK, with which US intelligence agencies work closely. “We have information indicating that the Russian government plans to place a pro-Russian leader in Kiev & rdquor ;, which in late January was condemned British Foreign Secretary Lis Trusseven mentioning the character who will lead the country: Yevhen Murayevleader of a small pro-Russian political party that doesn’t even have parliamentary representation.
lost the information war
Moscow’s response was to accuse Washington and London of disinformation, even though that’s true, implying by their behavior that for the first time in rising geopolitical tensions with the West, they have lost their initiative in information warfare and the only thing you can do is react. With a somewhat forced triumphant tone, Foreign spokeswoman Maria Zajárovadescribed the announcement, which remains to be confirmed, of the early withdrawal of Russian troops deployed along the border with Ukraine, as “the day when Western propaganda failed, was humiliated and crushed without firing a single shot”.
Related news
That Biden information policy has caused heated debate in the United States. Many voices saw memories of what happened almost two decades ago in Iraq war prelude, where a similar revelation that was proven wrong led the country to start a war whose wounds haven’t even healed yet. However, many expert voices replied that in this case Russia’s military deployment was corroborated by satellite-transmitted images, in addition to reminding that in this case it was about preventing war and not arguing. the eyes are clear.
The main criticism, however, did not come from the media, but from the State itself. This blatant disclosure may have affect boomerang to expose US sources of information in the Russian state, allowing Moscow to eventually blind them and further complicate access to the Kremlin’s true intentions in the future. “The great danger is that we run the risk of disclosing sources and methods,” Glenn S. Gerstell, former General Counsel at the National Security Agency, also told the New York newspaper.
“Web specialist. Incurable twitteraholic. Explorer. Organizer. Internet nerd. Avid student.”
