Especially June 10, 1829 the state created the Political and Military Command of the Malvinas Islands and was appointed Louis Vernet as commander in charge.

The decree established the unquestioned Spanish sovereignty and ownership of the Malvinas Archipelago. until the date of the Argentine emancipation movement, being Spain’s heir to the former Viceroyalty of Río de la Plata and succeeding him as the legal ruler of the Islands from 25 May 1810, in accordance with International Law. All that history has never been respected.

In the text, which he accessed A24.comthe country insists on complaints against Britain that “it maintains an unjustified and disproportionate military presence on the islands regularly carrying out maneuvers and drills that Argentina has vehemently protested against and that constitutes a willful departure from the call of many UN resolutions.” and other international organizations.

“As part of the UK’s militarization of the South Atlantic, the UK recently introduced a third party security force on the islands, which Argentina strongly protested as it was a willful deviation from the calls for in various resolutions of the United Nations and other international organisations. ,” says the official text.

The Argentine government also warned that it was observing “with concern” that “even today a strict immigration policy is being implemented with a policy that limits the possibility of establishing residence, acquiring land, contracting employment or commencing commercial or professional activities in the Malvinas Islands, especially with respect.” to Argentina who came from the continent”.

It also pointed out that “the refusal to comply with obligations to continue negotiations on sovereignty was compounded by the continued introduction of unilateral actions by the UK” and these acts mention “exploration and exploitation of renewable and non-renewable natural resources – which Argentina has refused without interruption”.

They also commented that “all democratic governments” in Argentina have “rejected the use of force and have continued to demonstrate their willingness to enter into bilateral negotiations as a means of reaching a peaceful solution to the dispute.”